Archive for November, 2007

Nov 30 2007

Welcome to Scotland

Published by Osama Saeed under Sottish Politics

_42476144_saltireboy300 Scotland's airports have been fitted out with new posters welcoming people to the country.

With the slogan "Welcome to Scotland" are different iconic images dependent on which city it is. At Glasgow Airport, this picture is plastered up of a Muslim boy from the demonstration I helped organise a week after the airport attack in June.

It's a great move. The location and the image neatly sum up how Scotland reacted to the outrage - by coming together and uniting against those that want to kill and maim.

Incidentally, does anyone know who this young man is? From what I gather, he's not been able to milk his fame properly.

While one photographer was looking for a picture like this, another took this one below:

2007080550070201_2 What is this obsession with veiled Muslim women? If photographers can't find one, they ask one to cover up. I actually saw this picture being taken, and the photographer asked her to pose like this.

No responses yet

Nov 30 2007

St Andrew’s Day

Published by Shuggy under Sottish Politics

The Scotsman has invited a number of people, many of whom you have probably never heard of (for good reason), to say what it is about Scotland that is worth celebrating.

Personally, one of the things about Scotland that I used to think was worth celebrating is that we didn't go in for the ghastly kitsch that is St Patrick's Day.

I'm concerned that this isn't going to be the case for much longer.

Also, I'm concerned that we're talking more shite than at any point in recorded history.

No responses yet

Nov 30 2007

Scotland and England on equal terms

Published by Osama Saeed under Sottish Politics

Dsc00124 I came across this copy of the Scotland Act in the foyer of the Scottish Parliament yesterday. Click on the image for a larger version of the Act that brought back into existence the Scottish Parliament in 1998.

This particular copy is personally signed by Tony Blair and addressed to Donald Dewar. He says:

To Donald,
It was a struggle, it may always be hard : but it was worth it. Scotland and England together on equal terms!
Tony Blair

Who would have thought this is what Tony really intended? We must redouble our efforts to make his vision a reality!

No responses yet

Nov 30 2007

What I’ve been doing

Published by Ken under Sottish Politics

Two-score and seven days ago, Martin Wisse kindly listed this as one of the top five socialist blogs that are not updated enough. I don't know about socialist, but I'll take my compliments where I find them, so thanks. The lack of updating is mainly because I'm very close to finishing a novel, which has taken longer than I expected.

The Night Sessions is a crime novel set in a future Scotland (and New Zealand) (and space), about fifteen years after the end of the Faith Wars, which began in 2001 and ended in 20--. It's taken so long because (a) I made false starts on two other novels earlier this year before hitting on this one; (b)I made the mistake of spending a lot of time planning it, in what turned out to be not quite enough detail to let me sit down and just write the damn thing; (c) the theme of the story (religious terrorism in a militantly secular society) got me distracted by, um, research.

Stuff like this:
The new atheists use this acultural modernity rhetoric in almost every argument that they make and every topic they touch.

For example, there is a cute saying that many of them trot out every once in a while: "I contend that we are both atheists. I just believe in one fewer god than you do. When you understand why you dismiss all the other possible gods, you will understand why I dismiss yours." Is this not a shining example of the acultural view of modernity? For the new atheists, it is simply a matter of opening your eyes and getting rid of all the "extra" (non-reasonable) beliefs one might have.
This is a good example of how an intelligent person can completely miss the point. For one thing, I don't know where he gets the 'acultural view of modernity' from - well, he cites where he gets it from, but I don't know of anyone it applies to. And the saying he refers to is not a good example of it. The new atheists (and the old atheists, like George H. Smith, who I think coined it) are using it to try to crowbar in closed minds an opening for the thought that you routinely apply to other religions the same kind of critical reasoning that they - as well as atheists - apply to yours.

And, having read far too many online apologists and sceptics than is good for my productivity, I have to agree. Towards other religions (and, in some cases, towards rival interpretations of their own religion) the typical believer who has considered the matter at all is not only an atheist, but a sceptic, a scoffer, and a higher critic. 'Every sect as far as reason will help them, gladly use it; when it fails them, they cry out it is a matter of faith, and beyond reason.' - John Locke

No responses yet

Nov 30 2007

St Albert’s revisited

Published by Osama Saeed under Sottish Politics

HMIE this week delivered a damning report into the management of St Albert's Primary School in Pollokshields, Glasgow.

Readers may remember that I blogged about the school almost two years ago, after Muslim parents were accused of being "extremists" for objecting to their children being forced to sit through Mass in the Muslim-majority Catholic denominational school.

I said at the time, in the face of much criticism, that the Head Teacher Frances Diver was grossly mismanaging the situation. It would be easy to say I feel vindicated in that stance given that she was singled out for criticism in the report, and was effectively sacked a few months ago in anticipation of the report's findings. The issues that HMIE identify though are more serious than this.

They also found that pace of learning was slow and that the kids were capable of much more. I've heard this said about other schools with large ethnic rolls in Glasgow by teachers that have worked in them. Expectations are set very low and a culture of low achievement is endemic. This may actually even be a wider issue amongst inner city schools, but is definitely present amongst ethnic minority ones.

In terms of religious observation at St Albert's though, the situation now is that the new head teacher has returned to how things were done 20 years ago. The few Catholic children there are in the school are taken out for Mass, while the Muslim children and those of other faiths carry on with class. Common sense has prevailed.

As I said, it was not easy talking about this issue when the story broke though. The front page of the Daily Record attacked the Muslim parents at the school, and outrageously, local MP Mohammad Sarwar didn't just abandon those parents, but he joined in with the attacks on them. Local leadership demands more than just making a judgement about which way the wind is blowing.

No responses yet

Nov 30 2007

Will ye NO come back again!

Published by Huttonian under Sottish Politics


Mendicant Piper
Originally uploaded by old_greywolf2000
Between trains yesterday I managed a quick visit to Princes Street. No sign of the young man with his wee dog-perhaps he has earned enough to winter in warmer climes-Dundee or Arbroath perhaps? But the Piper was out and about having abandoned his usual exposed pitch for a more sheltered ambush position just off the main street. Not a good day for attracting the specie. Few tourists and too cold to take hands out of pockets (an old Scottish excuse, that one) Even a stirring rendition of '100 Pipers an' 'a an' 'a' failed to stop folk in their tracks-but being 99 short of a full house this was perhaps not too surprising.

No responses yet

Nov 30 2007

Historic Scotland goes the whole way

Published by CR under Sottish Politics

Historic Scotland, with its headquarters at Longmore House in Salisbury Place, opened all its visitor premises for free today, St Andrews Day. Previously it had only allowed free entry to certain key premises such as Edinburgh Castle on St Andrews Day

No responses yet

Nov 30 2007

St Andrews Day Tartan launch for Uni

Published by CR under Sottish Politics

Today saw the University of Edinburgh launch its new tartan.

No responses yet

Nov 30 2007

‘Toughing it out’

Wendy Alexander is said by her supporters to be “toughing it out”. Answers to questions posed by the media as follows. Why write a personal letter to Paul Green in Jersey? Answer: still thought it was a corporate donation -...

No responses yet

Nov 30 2007

Almost over…

Published by RfS under Sottish Politics

Sorry Mr E but Guido is reporting that the love of your life is almost history. Yet again we see that you cannot trust a single word that comes out the mouth of a Labour politician. There is a paper trail showing that Wendy knew of the illegal donations made to her leadership campaign and the recipient is verifying its authenticity. Quite why Wendy needed to take the money is beyond me. Despite

No responses yet

Nov 30 2007

Lest we forget

Published by RfS under Sottish Politics

In all these days of money laundering and illegal campaign donations that the Labour party enjoy a spot of good old fashioned socialist hypocrisy. So let us remember on this day of really bad news that the son of Trish Godman MSP recently plead guilty to a £3.5m fraud as part of the Enron collapse. I am sure it will be hard for Trish to no longer be in the same financial position as Labour

No responses yet

Nov 30 2007

A New Friend

Published by RfS under Sottish Politics

I have just had a very pleasant St Andrew's day lunch in Glasgow where I was introduced to that most rare of specimens. The Glasgow City Council Tory councillor. Or as was suggested to him "Conservative Group Leader" as it sounds much grander. David seemed like a nice guy with some good principles and ideas, even if I prattled on a bit. Anyway, I appear to be building a collection of links to GCC

No responses yet

Nov 30 2007

Personal touch

And yet more. Paul Green is not happy. He’s the Jersey-based businessman whose donation to Team Alexander has caused the current row. He says he gave £950 (that sum again) to Glasgow South Labour Party without any fuss. More, he...

No responses yet

Nov 30 2007

“For Gordon Brown, this really is terminal”

Published by Mr Eugenides under Sottish Politics


Matthew Norman in absolutely cracking form:


There you are settling down to Strictly Come Dancing, pondering whether to offer a ministerial post to any of the current celebs as you once did to erstwhile hoofer Fiona Phillips. Little Douglas Alexander is contentedly perched on your knee, while in your paw-like hand nestles a nice big tumbler of Glenlivet, and for the first time in days you're starting to relax.

"I will tell ya this, Wee Dougie, I will tell you this," you say, jiggling him up and down, "the one saving grace is that at least things can't get any ...".

The phone rings.

[read the rest]


I wish I'd written that - and wish I either knew, or had had the wit to invent, the plural of 'fiasco' that Norman deploys later on...

No responses yet

Nov 30 2007

True grit

Published by Mr Eugenides under Sottish Politics


How curious:


Tom Cruise has been given a courage award for his role in his forthcoming film Valkyrie at a ceremony in Germany.

He was handed the Bambi award [?] for his portrayal of a Nazi officer in the film, about a failed assassination attempt on dictator Adolf Hitler.


Playing someone who tried to kill Hitler? Oh, yes, what a tremendously courageous artistic choice...

No responses yet

Nov 30 2007

Welcome To Scotland

Published by Richard Thomson under Sottish Politics

I'm about to head off to Inverurie for a ceilidh and then to Huntly for a racenight - both in aid of funds for the SNP campaign in Gordon. However, arriving at Edinburgh Airport last night, it's impossible to describe how much my heart lifted not to be greeted by a braggart yet brittle hoarding proclaiming my arrival in 'The Best (small) Country in the World'.

'Welcome to Scotland. Edinburgh - Home of the Enlightenment' says all that needs to be said about your arrival in the capital, and beats any corporate slogan which the city has adopted for itself over the past two decades. Meanwhile, I defy anyone not to crack a smile at the Glasgow board pictured below:


Well, I defy almost everyone. Leave out the 'my six year old could do better' tendency who bump their gums at everything, and you're left with substantial critics like Anita Califano, a senior consultant with the 2012 London Olympics logo creator Wolff Olins, who opines "It all fails to convey the spirit of the place, the emotion. If the purpose of branding is to create an emotional connection, they're not doing that."

Y-e-e-e-s. I rest my case :-)

No responses yet

Nov 30 2007

Happy St Andrew’s Day!

Published by Bill under Sottish Politics

Happy St Andrew's Day!

No responses yet

Nov 30 2007

Grave times for Alexander

Wendy Alexander has now apologised, personally, for the illegal donation accepted by her party. She has returned the unlawful cheque to the Electoral Commission. But, at the moment, that’s as far as it goes. Once more today, she declined to...

No responses yet

Nov 30 2007

Up their necks and sinking

Published by Mr Eugenides under Sottish Politics


Although the first reports of an illegal proxy donation came out on Sunday, the shit only really hit the fan early this week, by which time I was in Germany on a couple of days R&R (cheap beer, good meat-based food, smoking in pubs and an efficient mass transit system, thanks for asking). And so it was only seeing the papers at the airport on the way back that I grasped the full scale of the scandal.

I was not in the least surprised. And, addressing myself for a moment to any Labour supporters reading this, you will surely be forced to admit this inconvenient truth: neither were you.

The quite pathetic attempts of Gordon Brown and Harriet Harman to try to turn this into an issue "for all parties" to be ashamed of - or, even better, to blame this on the Tories - have been almost comical to behold. If you hadn't walked away from the talks on party funding, they bleat at the opposition benches, we'd have agreed state funding of political parties and we wouldn't be in this situation.

Pause for a minute to appreciate the sheer brazenness of this sentiment. It's the last-ditch retort of the teenager caught pilfering a fiver from his mother's purse; it's your fault, he whinges, for not giving me enough pocket money. You made me do it. All week, the people caught with their fingers in the till have studiously been substituting labels like "Labour" and "I" with the carefully chosen "all political parties" and "we", in an attempt to hoodwink us into thinking that they're only victims of a rotten system, rather than the criminals. The language of moral agency is nowhere to be seen. By an almost imperceptible sleight of verbal hand, money-laundering becomes everyone's fault, not just the people who are actually doing it.

This unique "don't blame us, everyone's at it" defence does at least contain a kernel of truth; all the main political parties have often benefited from shady funding arrangements, and all agree that me, you and John Q. should dip further into our wallets to pay for their activities, differing only on the small print. If we don't agree to fork out to keep them in the style to which they've become accustomed, they tell us with straight faces, then no wonder they will lie and steal to pay for their private polling and their databases of marginal voters and their doltish, lowest common denominator billboards. Are you thinking what I'm thinking? No, I fucking well am not.

The Byzantine intricacies of who knew what when, and who is now backstabbing whom, are fascinating, but covered better elsewhere. What is clear is that the official story is unravelling fast - a lot more people knew than they let on, and more seem to be joining the rolls every few hours. As the filthy, foul-smelling sewage laps around his ankles, the PM is obviously using dear old Harriet Harman as a sandbag to soak up the encroaching, shit-filled waters, and with some success. Gordon's people smelt a rat and tore up the £5000 cheque they'd received in the name of Abraham's secretary but, hilariously, still passed the donor's name on to Team Harman, who had overspent on her campaign and is still trying pay off all the bills - and she now stands accused of dumping Gordon in the brown stuff by pointing this out.

Indeed, Harriet's miraculous transformation from doughty feminist champion into wittering, clueless housewife has been a particular highlight of the last couple of days, and carries strong echoes of Tessa Jowell's similarly humiliating efforts at playing dumb last year. I don't understand such things, la Harman simpered plaintively last night. Jack pays all the bills, and changes all the lightbulbs. I'm just a simple lass. Fundraising? I honestly wouldn't know where to begin.

Like the sainted Tessa's suggestion that she didn't understand what she was doing when she signed a mortgage document for £400,000 which her husband then paid off four weeks later (clue: it's fifteen letters and rhymes with "honey laundering"), it's entirely risible and totally unbelievable. I wonder what all those Guardianistas who thought it was so important for Labour to have a woman in the deputy's job are thinking as they watch Harman channeling Nanette Newman in a desperate attempt to wriggle off the hook. I hope they're cringing. I think it's hilarious.

Splenetic right-wing commentators occasionally like to compare this nation to a banana republic, but the comparison is inapposite. In a true banana republic, the mob would have stormed the Palace of Westminster long ago, and Harman, Brown and the rest would be dangling from the lampposts on St Stephen's Green. The only real similarity is that, there as here, the contempt of our elected leaders for those they purport to represent is palpable. They drip disdain for the ungrateful voter. It oozes from every pore. Watching them on screen, you can almost reach out and touch it, it's so obvious.

The Downing Street website deletes all mention of the scandal from its transcripts of Tuesday's Prime Ministerial press conference - a particularly cute Orwellian touch. Jack Straw wanders on to the Today programme this morning to defend his comrades, and whines that it was Labour who had cleaned up the rules on party funding. "We have changed the culture quite considerably". You certainly have, you fucking crooks. "For a long time this was an unknown unknown. The moment it became a known known, we got on to it." Fuck off.

Right-wing bloggers, too, are criticised for our corrosive cynicism, and the way that we imply that all politicians are either incompetent or crooked. But, really, when this bunch of hypocritical, simian-browed fucktrumpets is unleashing wave after wave of ham-fisted ineptitude and breathtaking dishonesty on us, one after the other, almost as fast as we can type, what else are we to think?

Not all politicians are either incompetent or crooked. But the current administration is both. Fuck them all.

No responses yet

Nov 30 2007

Brown Trousers

Published by Reactionary Snob under Sottish Politics

Gordon Brown's kecks must be like a Mark Oaten midnight fantasy at present. 11 points behind in a poll this morning... Two months ago some polls were saying they were 11 points ahead. We know Darling's economics are poor but presumably even he can see that that is somewhat troubling.

The really amazing thing here is that this turnaround (not just on voting intention but views on government comepetence) has happened without any real kick in the nads for the public. Although the Child Benefit Disks have been lost, and this is appalling, there has as yet been no case of ID fraud linked to the loss of those disks. Northern Rock is in serious trouble but it hasn't actually collapsed.

People are beginning to worry about the future of the economy but as yet we haven't seen large numbers of repossessions of houses, a burst of the bubble in house prices (although the picture is looking decidedly less rosy) and no significant rise in unemployment. If these 'real life' effects do start to take place and there is a fair to middling chance that they will... how much further will they fall?

RS

No responses yet

Nov 30 2007

Happy St. Andrews Day

Published by Alister under Sottish Politics

Here is a bit of a strange one for St. Andrews day. Richard Jobson got a Tartan Clef award at a recent awards ceremony hosted by music therapy charity Nordoff-Robbins (Scotland). Presented by U2 guitar hero Mr T. Edge who said "Stuart Adamson's guitar playing left me feeling wholly inadequate. He had a big influence on me" and "We tried as a band on numerous occasions to do something as good as

No responses yet

Nov 30 2007

EU Sat-Nav gets go ahead

Published by RfS under Sottish Politics

I have been following the progress of the EU vanity project that is the Galileo Sat-Nav system even so far as writing a post or two on it. Originally a private consortium was to build and operate it but when it became clear the business model was typical EU shit the business backers pulled out for fear of loosing all their money in competition from the GPS system and the soon to be launched

No responses yet

Nov 30 2007

Published by Huttonian under Sottish Politics

Virgin on the ridiculous


"If you look out of the window you will see that the next station is Penrith. Otherwise keep your eyes shut. If leaving the train at Penrith please do so with your eyes open otherwise you may fall down the gap"

Said the Vigin Train Guard on the Lancaster -Edinburgh 'cross country' 9.57 yesterday.

and approaching Carlisle'

Next station Carlisle: 'If you don't want to go to Scotland, get off. It's your last chance'

And finally as we pulled into Embra Waverley Street:

'That's it Folks. Out you get, smartish, otherwise you'll be lost with the Christmas Mail.'

Good knockabout comedy if a bit wearisome for some of those fellow passengers nursing hangovers after wild nights out in the City of Lancaster. But a great improvement on the badly read, nasally intoned, GNER mumbled announcements which are the hall mark of that crumbling institution:

'Berwick is your next station stop. Take care when alighting from the train that you have all your personal possessions, none of your fellow passewngers' and that your wife does not fall through the gap between the train and the platform in which case any inconvenience is regretted'

Or that wonderful call to inaction:

' Attention Train Crew Disabled Passenger alarm activated'

In this regard National Express can only be better.

Hopefully

No responses yet

Nov 30 2007

Look to the future, because the past is so depressing

Published by RfS under Sottish Politics

Wendy Alexander said on Wednesday that she was 100% sure she had not accepted laundered money from Abrahams. That immediately made me think she looked guilty as hell. By Thursday it became clear that she was in fact up to her incredibly large mouth in the brown stuff, albeit in an attempt to show Scottish Labour are an independent entity she found another electoral law to break. Now she wants

No responses yet

Nov 29 2007

£$€!!!!!!!!!!!! - a tale of two similar scandals

Published by Will under Sottish Politics

We now have two Labour party funding scandals running concurrently: the UK Labour party receiving donations from a property developer via intermediataries. This has claimed the Party's General Secretary, mand it transpires, of course, that Harriet Harman received some similarly conveyed money from the same source to fund her successful bid for the Deputy Leadership. Further, the Electoral Commission have called in the police. If the police to follow this up with the vigour of the 'Cash for Honours' investigation, what will the CPS say? And will Labour dismiss the Electoral Commission's complaint as a political stunt? And given that Harriet Harman got into her position with the help of dirty money - that cash could have made the difference between her winning and Alan Johnson winning - how long can she stay in?

But tonight, news from Scottish Labour is that Wendy Alexander's Leadership campaign broke the law in an attempt to secure funding from a businessman based in Jersey, but with a UK registered company. Party Finance law states that only UK registered electors can donate to UK registered political parties, and all £1000+ donations have to be disclosed. Jersey does not count as a member of the United Kingdom, so for Paul Green to donate the money as himself is against the law. But for him to give it to Labour through his company, Combined Property Services, is perfectly legal, and to give £950 means he is within the donation limit and can aoid detection.

The problem is, Green's name was on the cheque, and therefore, he gave money to Wendy Alexander's campaign. Charlie Gordon, MSP for Glasgow Cathcart has already carried the can for this and quit as Labour's Transport Spokesman. Gordon specifically got in touch with Combined Property Services with the express intention of soliciting a donation, and it is believed to be one of many donations to Alexander in the £900-£1000 bracket. Regardless of the breakdown of individual donations, Alexander pocketed £17,000 for a leadership campaign in which she was the only candidate. In her bid to become Labour's Leader of the Opposition in Scotland, and their candidate for First Minister in 2011, Alexander's campaign attempted to side-step two clear rules and failed to make it around one of them. It is Gordon who pays the price, but there are other questions, regarding the donation, the campaign, and Gordon:

1. How many other donations were there in the £900-£1000 bracket?

2. Where did they come from?

3. Why did a leadership campaign in which there was only one candidate need £17,000?

4. How long after it became clear that Wendy would be returned unopposed did fundraising end?

5. With £950 returned to Green, what happened to the rest of the money? How was that spent in a campaign that wasn't needed?

6. Who instructed and/or permitted Gordon to seek out Combined Property Services?

7. What did Wendy Alexander know of the fundraising that was carried out on her behalf?

8. What did her campaign manager, Tom McCabe, know?

9. What connection is there, if any, with this scandal and the resignation of Lesley Quinn, Scottish Labour's General Secretary? Her UK equivalent resigned after he was implicated in the UK Labour scandal, but she went suddenly after decades of service to the party, before any of this happened. Did she know what was coming?

10. Seeing as Charlie Gordon was all for challenging Jack McConnell's leadership on the grounds that Labour members deserved a choice on who led Labour at Holyrood, what the Hell was he doing raising money for Wendy Alexander?

And an eleventh, far more damning question can be found at ASwaS.

No responses yet

Nov 29 2007

White Paki

Published by Osama Saeed under Sottish Politics

Just heard about a Muslim lady that was abused at the new Silverburn shopping complex in south Glasgow. She was pushing along a double-buggy containing two infants, while her other four-year-old son was walking along with her.

A group of youths started shouting "White Paki", presumably irked by the fact she is a convert to Islam that wears a hijab. They then lobbed a glass bottle at her which smashed into pieces but thankfully missed the family.

None of this is being reported to the police, despite advice to her to do so. My fear is that many incidents like this are going uncatalogued, meaning not only are louts getting away with it, but the scale and growth of the problem is going unnoticed by the authorities.

No responses yet

Nov 29 2007

Can you spot the pun?

Published by Andy under Sottish Politics

I'm off work just now and too ill to leave the house. So, to fill time, I've finally got round to learning Lebesgue integration.

"Why are you learning Lebesgue integration, Andy?"

For too long, I've felt that I'm incomplete without it.

Boom, boom.

No responses yet

Nov 29 2007

Published by Huttonian under Sottish Politics

Scots Wi' Hae or will Haggis do*?

A letter in today's Berwickshire reads:

I left Scotland in 1960 a Scots pie was filled with mutton, minced small with plenty of pepper as the recipe for Queen Victoria’s Balmoral pies, has it.
Now every Scots pie seems to be filled with beef sludge and no trace of thyme, parsley, mushroom or Worcester sauce as in F Marian McNeill’s recipes from Scotland, 1946.
Would not a return to the original recipe solve the problem of the farmers’ light lambs and broken mouthed ewes as opposed to the dairy farmers cast cows?


I don't know about that not being much into Mutton and have really little desire to eat Broken Mouthed Ewes although they may be less bitter than Broken Hearted ones who have seen their light lambs taken away to be roasted.

A BLOGGEE enquires, apropos of this topic, who to ask about the ingredients of Haggis. My advice is

not to.

You don't really want to know

(the title is from the verse of Wullie Robson, a Berwickshire Bard, little known contemporary of Rabbi Burns)

No responses yet

Nov 29 2007

Donations and resignations

First, the basics. Wendy Alexander’s campaign team broke the law by accepting a donation from a Labour supporter based in the Channel Islands. Offshore donations are not permitted. The cash was accepted because Charlie Gordon MSP, one of Team Alexander,...

No responses yet

Nov 29 2007

Labour donors anonymous

Published by Osama Saeed under Sottish Politics

Labour_donorsanon Why do so many Labour donors seem embarrassed about giving to the Labour Party? David Abrahams did it through his employees. Wendy Alexander's leadership campaign, where she had to beat nobody, raised £17,000 through attracting several donors of £995, just under the £1000 mark where they would have to be declared.

One of them as revealed in the Herald today was Jersey based (and thus not allowed to contribute) but did it through a Glasgow company. To compound matters, this is no different from the case of Abraham, or I believe front organisations like the Muslim Friends of Labour, which have served the effect of keeping anonymous people who are embarrassed at the idea of donating to Labour openly.

Both Abrahams and the Labour Party have maintained that the arrangement of third parties hiding the true donors was all above board. But as Calum Cashley points out, even a cursory reading of Electoral Commission guidelines would have knocked that on the head at an early stage:

Donations from an agent of the donor
4.29 If the original source of the donation is someone other than the individual or organisation that transfers the donation to the party, the individual or organisation making the transfer is acting as an agent for the original donor. Where a person acts as an agent in making a donation, they must ensure that the party is given all the relevant information as listed at paragraph 5.5 (Section 54(6)). Transferring a donation to an agent rather than directly to a party must not be used as an attempt to evade the controls on permissibility and transparency.

On Newsnight Scotland yesterday, Labour figures were deriding what they said were the SNP's attempts to bring a Scottish angle to the Abrahams row. That's been put to rest to by the Wendy Alexander revelations, and should also be by the Muslim Friends of Labour angle that contributed £300,000 to the party's Scottish elections campaign this year. It is also plain to see that if Labour funds in London had been bolstered by Abrahams' money, the grant they give the Scottish branch of their party taints their performance in the Scottish elections of 2007.

UPDATE: Adam Smith revisionist Marco Biagi joins some dots, while Calum has questions

No responses yet

Next »